

Photo Source: ITV-F1.co.uk
Alonso stormed round the circuit to snatch pole on Saturday, and from that position he started the race and produced a solid drive to win in front of Trulli in the Toyota. Toyota is at last looking like they have spent their millions in the right place, I'm sure Toyota HQ were getting a little annoyed at the lack of results but things are looking better.
The race was packed full of action, a huge contrast to Australia's race a few weekend ago. The Ferrari's yet again seem to be struggling and Shumi didn't seem to care much, just cruised round in a very uneventful race for him.
There were clashes, blow ups (poor BAR, it's just not happening this year so far)
and the man in the wars, Mark Webber had his car battered round, buy a Toyota and a Renault. The FIA has just blamed the incident on Fisi, and quite right as he made a move that was never going to work. Fisi knew this as did Webber as he pointed out in an interview, So why in the hell did Webber knowing that Fisi was going to slide wide, try to squeeze him from the outside? This only ended up with the side of his Williams caved in, was he surprised at the outcome? He should have been he placed his car right in the line of fire. He's an experienced driver, what was he thinking? Anyway if Fisi was to blame for making an irrational overtaking manouver then Webber was to blame for the accident, in my opinion.
Apart from Alonso and Trulli, Heidfeld dodged the clumsy drivers behind to collect a well earned 3rd.
McLaren yet again didn't have the pace that they had shown in testing, yes on one lap they were quick but with tyre problems and imbalances I think McLaren has produced a car that doesn't match upto the Renault best suites these new tyre regulations. The Renault's seem to be designed bottom up around understeer, hence the great drive out of corners and quick starts. This style seems to look after the rear tyres better than everybody else. Bahrain next and I expect Ferrari will bring the 2005 race car, they need too. AS